BY BUSINESS OBJECTIVE
ASSESS & VALIDATE — FIND WEAKNESSES
Digisecuritas logo

SECURE REMOTE & HYBRID WORKFORCE

Secure Work Wherever It Happens

People now reach business systems from offices, homes, customer sites and mobile devices. The location may change several times in a week, but the organisation still needs confidence in the identity, device, session and information involved.

Digisecuritas assesses how remote access works in practice, identifies weak trust paths and helps teams apply security without making everyday work unnecessarily difficult.

Independent assessment across identity, devices, access and data.

WORKFORCE ACCESS CORRIDOR

1

User

Employee, contractor or supplier

2

Device

Managed, personal or temporary

3

Access decision

Identity, device state, location and risk

4

Business resource

Application, cloud service or internal system

5

Data and action

Access limited to the approved purpose

AuthenticateEvaluateRestrictMonitorRevoke

People move

Employees and suppliers work across changing locations and networks.

Devices vary

Managed, personal and shared devices create different levels of confidence.

Applications are distributed

Users access SaaS, cloud and internal resources through separate paths.

Data travels

Information moves through email, collaboration tools, downloads and personal workspaces.

THE WORKFORCE ACCESS CORRIDOR

Every connection should earn the access it receives

Remote work becomes difficult to secure when access depends mainly on network location or one successful login. A stronger model evaluates the user, device, requested resource and available risk signals before access is granted.

NIST's Zero Trust guidance responds directly to environments involving remote users, personal devices and cloud resources. It focuses protection on users, assets and resources rather than relying on the traditional network perimeter. NIST SP 800-207 provides the relevant framework.

01

Identity

Who is requesting access?

Account ownershipAuthenticationMultifactor authenticationPrivileged usersContractors and suppliersAccount recoveryLifecycle controls
02

Device

What level of confidence can be placed in the device?

Device ownershipManagement statusSecurity configurationEndpoint protectionEncryptionPatch statusPersonal device conditions
03

Connection

How is the user reaching the resource?

VPNZero Trust accessRemote desktopVirtual desktopsCloud accessAdministrative gatewaysInternet exposure
04

Resource and data

What does the user need to reach?

Application sensitivityData classificationDownload controlsExternal sharingAdministrative functionsSession restrictionsLeast privilege
05

Monitoring and response

Can unsafe access be identified and ended?

Authentication logsDevice riskSession activityData movementRemote-access alertsAccount suspensionIncident escalation

Workforce security services built around real working conditions

Remote and hybrid workforce assessment

Review how workforce identities, devices, connections, applications and data controls work together. Identify weak paths and provide a sequenced improvement plan.

Explore this service →

Remote-access architecture review

Assess VPNs, Zero Trust access, virtual desktops, gateways, administrative access and cloud application paths. Clarify which users and devices should use each route.

Explore this service →

Endpoint and BYOD security assessment

Review managed and personal device controls, enrolment, encryption, endpoint protection, patching, local data and access conditions.

NIST SP 800-46 provides guidance for telework, remote access and BYOD security, including related policy considerations. NIST enterprise telework and BYOD guidance

Explore this service →

Workforce identity and MFA review

Assess authentication coverage, exceptions, account recovery, contractors, privileged access and higher-risk workforce groups. Define a practical route towards phishing-resistant authentication where appropriate.

CISA recommends that organisations plan for phishing-resistant MFA. CISA multifactor authentication guidance

Explore this service →

Cloud collaboration security review

Examine email, shared files, meetings, external collaboration, guest access, sharing policies and sensitive-data movement across cloud productivity platforms.

Explore this service →

Third-party remote-access assessment

Review how suppliers, support teams and outsourced providers request, receive, use and lose remote access to business systems.

Explore this service →

HOW WE WORK

Follow access from the worker to the resource

01

Define the workforce

Identify employees, contractors, suppliers, administrators, locations, device types and resources in scope.

02

Map access paths

Document how each population reaches cloud applications, internal systems, sensitive data and privileged functions.

03

Validate controls

Review architecture, configuration, policies, logs and operational evidence. Technical testing occurs only where authorised.

04

Prioritise change

Separate urgent exposure from longer-term architecture, device-management and workforce-policy improvements.

The roadmap should identify owners, dependencies and evidence required to confirm that each change works.

Where remote and hybrid access commonly breaks down

Incomplete MFA coverage

Legacy access, recovery routes or exceptions bypass the intended authentication control.

Unmanaged devices

Sensitive resources remain accessible from devices with unknown security condition.

Standing supplier access

Third-party accounts and remote connections remain active outside approved work.

Local data copies

Downloads, browser storage and personal workspaces place information outside managed controls.

Exposed remote services

Administrative portals, remote desktop or access gateways are reachable without sufficient restriction.

Limited session visibility

Teams can confirm that a login occurred but cannot determine what happened afterwards.

Preparing a permanent hybrid-work modelReplacing or reducing VPN dependenceIntroducing BYODReviewing access after an incident or acquisition

What your organisation receives

A practical view of how people connect, what they can reach and where control needs to improve.

Executive workforce-risk briefing

Remote-access architecture view

User and device population map

Access-path findings

Authentication and MFA coverage analysis

BYOD and endpoint observations

Cloud collaboration findings

Third-party access review

Monitoring and response gaps

Prioritised remediation roadmap

Ownership and dependency guidance

Technical and executive readout

Final deliverables depend on the technologies, workforce populations and access paths included in the agreed scope.

Independent advice without forcing one access model

Work before technology

Recommendations reflect how teams, contractors and suppliers actually need to work.

Identity and devices together

The assessment examines both sides of the access decision rather than relying on authentication alone.

Platform-neutral judgement

Existing VPN, endpoint, identity and cloud investments are assessed before replacement is considered.

Priorities teams can implement

The roadmap separates immediate corrections from planned architecture changes.

Remote and hybrid workforce security questions

The scope can include identity, authentication, devices, VPN or Zero Trust access, cloud applications, collaboration, sensitive data, suppliers, monitoring and incident response.

A VPN can protect a connection, but it does not establish whether the user should reach every resource behind it. Identity, device condition, privilege, segmentation and monitoring remain necessary.

Yes. The assessment can review which resources personal devices may access, how business data is separated, which minimum controls apply and how access is removed.

No. Zero Trust is an architecture and decision model rather than a single replacement product. Some organisations retain VPN access for specific use cases while introducing more granular controls elsewhere.

Yes. Digisecuritas can review identity, approval, authentication, connection paths, session control, monitoring and the removal of supplier access.

Access conditions should reflect the resource, device, user role and consequence of compromise. Administrative and high-risk access normally requires stronger controls.

Yes. Cloud productivity and collaboration controls can be included. Detailed Microsoft-specific security work can be linked to the Microsoft Security service.

Most evidence gathering is designed to avoid disruption. Any technical testing or configuration change requires an agreed scope and authorisation.

SECURE THE WAY YOUR PEOPLE WORK

Find the gaps between the user, device and business resource

Tell us how your workforce connects and which access paths concern you. Digisecuritas will help define the right assessment scope and a practical route to stronger control.

Independent assessment • Platform-neutral advice • Clear priorities